Human-Centered Digital Catechesis in Multicultural Contexts An Integrative Framework for Catholic Faith Formation

Main Article Content

Bernardus Agus Rukiyanto
Roawie L. Quimba
Sujay Daniel

Abstract

Digital platforms and generative artificial intelligence reshape the conditions under which Catholic faith formation is received, interpreted, and practiced. This conceptual theological study asks how digital catechesis can be held accountable to human and ecclesial flourishing in multicultural settings. Through an integrative review of Catholic theological anthropology, catechetical theory, digital religion, the capability approach, dialogical education, participatory design, and human-centered AI, it develops a three-level framework linking a normative account of the person, formative practices, and institutional conditions. The framework identifies four practices—interpretive encounter, dialogical inquiry, mediated-embodied continuity, and critical cultural translation and four institutional requirements: answerable authority, capability floors, data and algorithmic stewardship, and reflexive evaluation. It argues that human-centeredness cannot be reduced to usability, personalization, or engagement. AI may support access, translation, analysis, and routine learning, but it cannot replace sacramental participation, pastoral responsibility, embodied witness, or contextual empathy. The proper evaluative question is whether participants gain a real and responsible freedom to understand, question, answer, belong, and act in faith. Seven research propositions indicate how the framework can be tested across parishes, schools, dioceses, and networked communities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

Author Biographies

Roawie L. Quimba, Ateneo de Davao University

Chair of Theology Department, Ateneo de Davao University, Davao City, Philippines

Sujay Daniel, St Aloysius University

Research scholar, Department of Biotechnology and Neuroscience, St Aloysius University, Mangalore -575003, India

How to Cite

Human-Centered Digital Catechesis in Multicultural Contexts: An Integrative Framework for Catholic Faith Formation. (2026). Journal of Missionary Media, 1(2). https://jmm.utamaenterprise.com/jmm/article/view/19

References

Andok, M. (2024). The impact of online media on religious authority. Religions, 15(9), 1103. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15091103

Ashraf, C. (2022). Exploring the impacts of artificial intelligence on freedom of religion or belief online. The International Journal of Human Rights, 26(5), 757–791. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2021.1968376

Berger, A., & Golan, O. (2024). Online religious learning: Digital epistemic authority and self-socialization in religious communities. Learning, Media and Technology, 49(2), 274–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2023.2169833

Campbell, H. A. (2010). When religion meets new media. Routledge.

Campbell, H. A., & Evolvi, G. (2020). Contextualizing current digital religion research on emerging technologies. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.149

Campbell, H. A., & Tsuria, R. (Eds.). (2022). Digital religion: Understanding religious practice in digital media (2nd ed.). Routledge.

CAST. (2024). Universal Design for Learning guidelines version 3.0. https://udlguidelines.cast.org

Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford University Press.

Dicastery for Communication. (2023). Towards full presence: A pastoral reflection on engagement with social media. The Holy See. https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/dpc/documents/20230528_dpc-verso-piena-presenza_en.html

Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, & Dicastery for Culture and Education. (2025). Antiqua et Nova: Note on the relationship between artificial intelligence and human intelligence. The Holy See. https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_ddf_doc_20250128_antiqua-et-nova_en.html

Floridi, L. (2023). The ethics of artificial intelligence: Principles, challenges, and opportunities. Oxford University Press.

Freire, P. (2018). Pedagogy of the oppressed (50th anniversary ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.

Hjarvard, S. (2008). The mediatization of religion: A theory of the media as agents of religious change. Northern Lights, 6(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1386/nl.6.1.9_1

Missier, C. A. (2025). A qualitative study of digital religious influence. Religions, 16(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16010073

Novak, C., Haselbacher, M., Mattes, A., & Limacher, K. (2022). “We are doing research”: Research with religious youth on Instagram. Religions, 13(3), 213. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13030213

Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Harvard University Press.

Owen, J. (2026). Detecting doctrinal flattening in AI-generated responses. AI and Ethics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-026-01051-0

Ozmen Garibay, O., Winslow, B., Andolina, S., Antona, M., Bodenschatz, A., Coursaris, C., Falco, G., Fiore, S. M., Garibay, I., Grieman, K., Havens, J. C., Jirotka, M., Kacorri, H., Karwowski, W., Kider, J., Konstan, J., Koon, S., Lopez-Gonzalez, M., Maifeld-Carucci, I., ... Xu, W. (2023). Six human-centered artificial intelligence grand challenges. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(3), 391–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2153320

Pontifical Council for Promoting the New Evangelization. (2020). Directory for catechesis. Libreria Editrice Vaticana.

Rähme, B. (2025). Religious studies approaches to the intersection of artificial intelligence and religion. Religion, 55. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2025.2506893

Recuero, R. (2024). The platformization of violence: Toward a concept of discursive toxicity on social media. Social Media + Society, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231224264

Rukiyanto, B. A. (2025). Artificial intelligence dan martabat manusia dalam pendidikan iman. In A. M. Habur & E. L. Gaol (Eds.), Berkatekese berbasis AI: Strategi dan praktik untuk meningkatkan pengajaran iman (pp. 237-256). PT Kanisius.

Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283

UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137

UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386693

Zhang, J., Song, W., & Liu, Y. (2025). Cognitive bias in generative AI influences religious education. Scientific Reports, 15, 15720. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-99121-6